Cultural Migration
Where did you come from and why?
Coming to terms with diversity in an increasingly interconnected
multicultural world has become one of the most pressing public policy projects for democracies
in the early 21st century. The wide-scale movement of people is as much a defining feature of globalization as the
movement of goods, services, and capital. And countries are just as reluctant-if not more
so-to open their borders to people as to those items. As with trade and capital, citizens
fear that their culture and their jobs are susceptible to being eliminated by uncontrolled
immigration.
At the same time, again as with free trade and investment, economies and societies
need input from outside their borders in order to continue economic growth. Furthermore, some
countries, most importantly the United States, are committed to open borders
because of the nature of their national identity as a mix of different immigrant groups. European
countries are less open to immigration and significant social conflict has developed between
native citizens and new arrivals, particularly those from Africa and the Middle East. Even
countries that send migrants to other countries and benefit from the remittances they send back
are concerned about "brain drain" that may limit their development in their home county. Nevertheless, migration will be a major, unstoppable fact of global life until the economic
disparities between sending and receiving states are eliminated, if ever. Even when goods,
services, or capital can be blocked by government action, the smuggling of human beings and
the resulting population of illegal immigrants in host countries is a common feature of developed
countries.
Sociologists have long analyzed migration in terms of the "push-pull" model. This model
differentiates between push factors that drive people to leave home from pull factors that
attract migrants to a new location. Push factors occur within sending states, that is, those
that send migrants abroad, while pull factors occur within receiving states, that is, states
that receive immigrants from sending states abroad. Push factors are negative aspects of the
sending country, while pull factors are positive aspects of the receiving country. In fact,
these differentiating factors are really two sides of the same coin. In moving migrants must
not only see a lack of benefits at home (push factors) but also a surplus of benefits abroad
(pull factors), otherwise the move would not be worthwhile. There are also more ambiguous
factors, called network factors that can either facilitate or deter migration. As mentioned
above, network factors include cost of travel, the ease of communication, and international
business trends. These factors are not related to a specific country, but still have a profound
effect on international migration.
Push factors come in many forms. Sometimes these factors leave people with no choice but to
leave their country of origin. Following are some examples of push factors driving people to
emigrate from their home country. 1) Lack of Jobs/Poverty: Economics provides the main reason
behind migration. In some countries jobs simply do not exist for a great deal of the population.
In others, the gap between the rewards of labor in the sending and receiving country are
great enough so as to warrant a move. 2) Civil Strife/War/Political and Religious Persecution:
Some migrants are impelled to cross national borders by war or persecution at home. Some of these
migrants end up in receiving countries as refugees or asylum seekers. The 1951 Geneva Convention
Relating to the Status of Refugees defined the qualifications for such migrants and bound
signatory countries not to return these newcomers to places where they could be persecuted.
3) Environmental Problems: Environmental problems and natural disasters often cause the
loss of money, homes, and jobs.
Whereas push factors usually drive migrants out of their
countries of origin, pull factors generally decide where these travelers end up.
The positive aspects of some receiving countries serve to attract more migrants than others.
Following are some examples of the pull factors attracting migrants to receiving countries.
1) Higher standards of living/Higher wages: Economics provide the both biggest push and pull factor for
potential migrants. People moving to more developed countries will often find that the same work
they were doing at home can be rewarded abroad with higher wages. 2) Labor Demand: Almost all
developed countries have found that they need migrants' labor. 3) Political and Religious
Freedom: Throughout history the have faced persecution or discrimination in most parts
of the world.
A third somewhat specialized catagory of migrate are Forced Migrants (Trafficked people).
These are people who are moved by deception or coercion for the purposes of exploitation. The
profit in trafficking people comes not from their movement, but from the sale of their sexual
services or labour in the country of destination. The trafficked person may be physically
prevented from leaving, or be bound by debt or threat of violence to themselves or their
family in their country of origin. Like smuggling, by its very clandestine nature, figures
on the number of people being trafficked are extremely difficult to obtain.
The economic effects of migration vary widely. Sending countries
may experience both gains and losses in the short term but may stand to gain over the longer
term. For receiving countries temporary programs help to address skills shortages but may
decrease domestic wages and add to public welfare burden. "While every mouth brings a pair of
hands, these hands sometimes make more than they eat and sometimes less," noted a writer in the
Financial Times. Nevertheless, most commentators argue that the net effects of migration are
generally positive. The Economist magazine, for example, claimed that loosening restrictions on
labor migration "would be one of the fastest ways to boost global economic growth." The positive
effects, they say, would be significantly greater than removal of any trade barriers. For sending countries, the short-term economic benefit of
emigration is found in remittances. According to the Financial Times, remittances worldwide
are estimated at $60-70 billion per year, larger than development aid given to poor countries.
At the same time, developing countries can suffer from "brain drain"-the
loss of trained and educated individuals to emigration, an example of the possible negative
effects of emigration for developing countries.
In his message for the 91st World Day of Migrants and Refugees ,
Pope John Paul II (bio - news) remarks that while immigrants seek to adjust to the culture of
a new society, the society should also help them with that transition. At a time when human
migration is at an unprecedented level, the Pope says that "individuals must seek the proper
balance between respect for their own identity and recognition of that of others." That principle
applies to both the immigrant and the welcoming society, he explains. The Pontiff calls for a
balanced between the "assimilationist model," in which all immigrants are expected to submerge
themselves into the local culture; and the "marginalization of immigrants, with attitudes that
can even arrive at the choice of apartheid." The best solution, he says, is one which respects
different cultural traditions, and accepts legitimate differences out of respect for others.
Related Links:
Historians and the Web: A Beginners Guide
http://www.theaha.org/perspectives/issues/1996/9601/9601COM3.CFM
Reading, Writing, and Researching for History.
A Guide for College Students
http://academic.bowdoin.edu/WritingGuides/
Professor Rael's guide includes sound advice on how to go about historical
research, but only in general terms and as part of a larger discussion
of the skills undergraduates need for all phases of studying history. A
number of sites take a more closely focused approach, teaching the basic steps
of doing historical research. Two, which were created in connection with
college courses on historical methods, stand out as noteworthy examples of how to
do so through the use of case studies:
Why Study History Through Primary Sources
Fordham University, Medieval Sourcebook:
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/robinson-sources.html
The Historian's Sources American Memory Project Learning Page
http://lcweb2.loc.gov/learn/lessons/psources/pshome.html
For further suggestions check the site
Finding Primary Sources
prepared by Gretchen Revie of the Lawrence University Library.
Although you should begin your search for primary sources in traditional
sites like libraries, the Internet, on which more and more electronic
archives appear all the time, offers another possible avenue of approach. For a
sampling, see the listings on the Electronic
Archives page of this web site. Collections of recorded interviews, or "oral histories," provide another new source of primary
materialsfor more recent times, as do collections of photographs and documentary
films.
For more information on Oral history, see the University of California at Berkeley One
Minute Guide to Oral History.
Using Historical Sources
http://campus.northpark.edu/history//Classes/Basics/UsingSources.html
How to Read a Primary Source